<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deadspin Goes Medieval On ESPN &#8211; Is It Too Much?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.launchsquad.com/blogs/exclamation/2009/10/28/deadspin-goes-medieval-on-espn-%e2%80%93-is-it-too-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.launchsquad.com/blogs/exclamation/2009/10/28/deadspin-goes-medieval-on-espn-%e2%80%93-is-it-too-much/</link>
	<description>Stories, Ideas and Loud Noises</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Cornthwaite</title>
		<link>http://www.launchsquad.com/blogs/exclamation/2009/10/28/deadspin-goes-medieval-on-espn-%e2%80%93-is-it-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-29087</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Cornthwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.launchsquad.com/blogs/exclamation/?p=1105#comment-29087</guid>
		<description>&quot;When an unnamed source misleads, as far as we’re concerned, they lose the right to remain in the shadows,&quot;  -- in the conversation on #espnhorndoggery. 

Even if you do punish a source like that, what kind of credibility can you hold onto for the future? Whether or not &quot;muckraking&quot; is good for the company, it seems as if this quote leads more to exposing truth than leading the company toward fixing the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When an unnamed source misleads, as far as we’re concerned, they lose the right to remain in the shadows,&#8221;  &#8212; in the conversation on #espnhorndoggery. </p>
<p>Even if you do punish a source like that, what kind of credibility can you hold onto for the future? Whether or not &#8220;muckraking&#8221; is good for the company, it seems as if this quote leads more to exposing truth than leading the company toward fixing the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
